NAC Advisory - California

***********************************************************************
                    NATURIST ACTION COMMITTEE
                            ADVISORY
**********************************************************************
                  **http://www.naturistaction.org*
**********************************************************************
Copyright 2009 by the Naturist Action Committee, which is responsible
for its content. Permission is granted for the posting, forwarding or
redistribution of this message, provided that it is reproduced in its
entirety and without alteration.

DATE   : July 21, 2009
SUBJECT: California Advisory
TO     : All naturists and other concerned citizens

Dear Naturist,

This is an advisory from the Naturist Action Committee (NAC) concerning an
important situation in the state of California.

Responding to a request from legal counsel for the California Department of
Parks & Recreation (DPR), the California Court of Appeal for the 4th
District has published the previously unpublished ruling it rendered last
month in the San Onofre State Beach case. The recent appellate ruling
overturned a 2008 Superior Court victory by the Naturist Action Committee
and Friends of San Onofre Beach, a local naturist group.

At issue is whether DPR has followed proper procedure in abruptly ending the
application of the Cahill/Harrison regulation at San Onofre State Beach.
Cahill/Harrison is long-standing and well-known means for managing and
regulating the clothing-optional use of portions of state parks.

The unpublished ruling applied only to San Onofre State Beach. However,
publication gives the ruling greater precedential effect and allows the
possibility that rangers may ignore the Cahill policy and may begin issuing
citations for nudity at other state parks under Title 14, Section 4322 of
the California Code of Regulations.

CAHILL

It has been suggested by some that the Cahill Policy has remained in effect
throughout the years entirely through the good will of the California Parks
Department. If that has been so, then the good will ended in May, 2008, when
Parks Director Ruth Coleman singled out San Onofre State Beach and said,
"Cahill does not apply there."

>From that moment, the Cahill Policy became badly damaged goods. If it could
be terminated abruptly and without appropriate process or public involvement
at one state park, then it could happen at any state park, at any time. So
much for good will.

Trusting the good will of public officials for something as important as
protection from arrest for benign behavior has never been an intelligent
choice. Relying on that same promise of good will after the trust has been
publicly and intentionally broken is simply folly.

CHOICES

Confronted with the crippling damage dealt to the Cahill Policy at San
Onofre, the Naturist Action Committee faced a basic choice. It could accept
the loss of San Onofre, it could negotiate, or it could fight.

When the Parks Department refused to negotiate, NAC chose to fight.

NAC did not, and does not, look on the Cahill/Harrison regulation as a
matter of good will. It's a regulation, and it has been used exactly as
regulation by each successive administration of the California Parks
Department for THIRTY YEARS.

The Superior Court accepted NAC's contention that Cahill/Harrison is a
regulation. The Court of Appeal recognized it as a regulation, too, though
its different view concerning quality and extent were what allowed the
reversal of the Superior Court's procedural requirements for undoing the
regulation.

NAC's legal challenge to DPR's arbitrary destruction of Cahill at San Onofre
did not cripple Cahill. That damage quite clearly had already been
inflicted. Trusting "good will" while waiting for the next shoe to drop will
NOT restore the damaged Cahill Policy. And at NO point has it EVER been true
that accepting the loss of San Onofre will somehow inoculate naturists
against the similar loss of another California beach or another California
state park.

TICKETS?

DPR spokespersons have given conflicting information. One predicted that the
Department would "tread lightly" on the matter of citations for nudity in
state parks. Referring to San Onofre, another has said that no action was
planned until at least after Labor Day. The truth is that there's really no
way to know for sure.

WHAT HAPPENS NEXT?

Later this week, the Naturist Action Committee will file its petition to
have the case heard by the California Supreme Court.

NAC will continue to issue Action Alerts, Advisories and Updates on this
issue as circumstances require. Look for them.

MORE INFORMATION

Details of this situation and specifics of the Cahill/Harrison Regulation
and associated documents may be found on the NAC Web site:
http://www.naturistaction.org/sanonofre

There, you will find background documents related to the Cahill Policy, the
Harrison letter and NAC's lawsuit. You will also find this NAC Advisory on
the NAC Web site: http://www.naturistaction.org . Click on ALERTS,
ADVISORIES & UPDATES, and look under Current Advisories.

PLEASE HELP NAC TO CONTINUE HELPING NATURISTS!

The Naturist Action Committee remains committed to the vigorous defense of
the clothing-optional use of public land. Activism on behalf of naturists
can be expensive. NAC relies entirely on the voluntary financial support of
people like YOU.

Won't you please send a generous donation to:

 NAC
 PO Box 132
 Oshkosh, WI 54903

Or call toll free (800) 886-7230 (8AM-4PM, Central Time, weekdays) to donate
by phone using your MasterCard, Visa or Discover Card. Or use your credit
card to make a convenient online donation:
http://www.naturistaction.org/donate/

Thank you for choosing to make a difference.

Naturally,

Bob Morton
Executive Director
Naturist Action Committee

---------------------------------------------------------------
Naturist Action Committee (NAC) - PO Box 132, Oshkosh, WI 54903
Executive Dir. Bob Morton       - execdir@naturistaction.org
Board Member Allen Baylis       - rab@baylislaw.com
Online Rep. Dennis Kirkpatrick  - naturist@sunclad.com
---------------------------------------------------------------